<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 12 RAM Disk Software Benchmarked for Fastest Read and Write Speed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.raymond.cc/blog/12-ram-disk-software-benchmarked-for-fastest-read-and-write-speed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/12-ram-disk-software-benchmarked-for-fastest-read-and-write-speed/</link>
	<description>Daily updated news of useful advanced computer tips and tricks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zibri (http://www.zibri.org)</title>
		<link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/12-ram-disk-software-benchmarked-for-fastest-read-and-write-speed/#comment-515906</link>
		<dc:creator>Zibri (http://www.zibri.org)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raymond.cc/blog/?p=6671#comment-515906</guid>
		<description>With imdisk on my system (windows 7 64 with 12 GB of DDR3 1600 8-8-8-24 CR1 ram and a core i7 950 at 4.2 ghz)

I get:Seq: 5830    7990512k: 5756   74744k: 1004     8644k qd32: 2020 1537
http://i55.tinypic.com/1y91y8.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With imdisk on my system (windows 7 64 with 12 GB of DDR3 1600 8-8-8-24 CR1 ram and a core i7 950 at 4.2 ghz)</p>
<p>I get:Seq: 5830    7990512k: 5756   74744k: 1004     8644k qd32: 2020 1537<br />
<a href="http://i55.tinypic.com/1y91y8.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://i55.tinypic.com/1y91y8.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valdemar Peña</title>
		<link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/12-ram-disk-software-benchmarked-for-fastest-read-and-write-speed/#comment-515627</link>
		<dc:creator>Valdemar Peña</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 00:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raymond.cc/blog/?p=6671#comment-515627</guid>
		<description>Excellent post! i keep it with DATARAM RAMdisk, which have the fastest read/write operations reported.

Thanks Ray.


oh, and its free up to 4 Geebees..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post! i keep it with DATARAM RAMdisk, which have the fastest read/write operations reported.</p>
<p>Thanks Ray.</p>
<p>oh, and its free up to 4 Geebees..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dushko</title>
		<link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/12-ram-disk-software-benchmarked-for-fastest-read-and-write-speed/#comment-512403</link>
		<dc:creator>dushko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raymond.cc/blog/?p=6671#comment-512403</guid>
		<description>louis!
simple:YES
sophisticated:if your bios sees 4 gigs and your 32bit OS those 3.2-3.5(???)gigs you can use the rest for ramdisk. XP creates a pagefile even if not needed, so my estimate is: use 1GB for RamDisk and put page and temp+temporary internet there. I heard you can have your ramdisk saved to a hdd as files or a disk image(even iso) before shutdown or simultaneously when idling. This could even prevent fragmentation buildup issues caused by small cookies and temp.inet.files! and still spare your data usage when mobile or speeding up browser startup when having a bunch of tabs open.
I&#039;m even considering somehow  setting ramdisk as the default pagefile drive, but setting XP not to use one - XP will still use one, but not the equivalent amount of physical RAM, just around 0.3-0.5 GB, but it&#039;s just guesswork yet, cause I didn&#039;t really bother trying it out yet.
I will update as soon as done....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>louis!<br />
simple:YES<br />
sophisticated:if your bios sees 4 gigs and your 32bit OS those 3.2-3.5(???)gigs you can use the rest for ramdisk. XP creates a pagefile even if not needed, so my estimate is: use 1GB for RamDisk and put page and temp+temporary internet there. I heard you can have your ramdisk saved to a hdd as files or a disk image(even iso) before shutdown or simultaneously when idling. This could even prevent fragmentation buildup issues caused by small cookies and temp.inet.files! and still spare your data usage when mobile or speeding up browser startup when having a bunch of tabs open.<br />
I&#8217;m even considering somehow  setting ramdisk as the default pagefile drive, but setting XP not to use one &#8211; XP will still use one, but not the equivalent amount of physical RAM, just around 0.3-0.5 GB, but it&#8217;s just guesswork yet, cause I didn&#8217;t really bother trying it out yet.<br />
I will update as soon as done&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis</title>
		<link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/12-ram-disk-software-benchmarked-for-fastest-read-and-write-speed/#comment-510288</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 06:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raymond.cc/blog/?p=6671#comment-510288</guid>
		<description>Great test (The only one that I know of,actually).
But question:why is everyone focusing on the Dataram solution when it&#039;s only occupies the... sixth position in the benchmark ?
No feedback on the Qsoft RAMDrive Enterprise by any chance ?
Thank you.

PS:
classical question I guess but does a ram drive allow you to use the totality of the physical Ram available or only what Windows detects (Typically,3.2 GB on a 32 bits system when 4 GB are truly installed) ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great test (The only one that I know of,actually).<br />
But question:why is everyone focusing on the Dataram solution when it&#8217;s only occupies the&#8230; sixth position in the benchmark ?<br />
No feedback on the Qsoft RAMDrive Enterprise by any chance ?<br />
Thank you.</p>
<p>PS:<br />
classical question I guess but does a ram drive allow you to use the totality of the physical Ram available or only what Windows detects (Typically,3.2 GB on a 32 bits system when 4 GB are truly installed) ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Konrad</title>
		<link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/12-ram-disk-software-benchmarked-for-fastest-read-and-write-speed/#comment-507559</link>
		<dc:creator>Konrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 21:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raymond.cc/blog/?p=6671#comment-507559</guid>
		<description>I Have tested Dataram RAMdisk with a 1GB Ramdisk. My result also much lower (300MB/s). Further I have testet the real life performance with several applications (Firefox, Photoshop, Gimp, VLC) and stopped the time of several processes. Result: the Ramdisk is not faster than my hard disk (Seagate, 60MB/s), often even slower. 

I didn&#039;t test the other Ramdisk programs, but Dataram is not worth the time to install...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I Have tested Dataram RAMdisk with a 1GB Ramdisk. My result also much lower (300MB/s). Further I have testet the real life performance with several applications (Firefox, Photoshop, Gimp, VLC) and stopped the time of several processes. Result: the Ramdisk is not faster than my hard disk (Seagate, 60MB/s), often even slower. </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t test the other Ramdisk programs, but Dataram is not worth the time to install&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fortigurn</title>
		<link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/12-ram-disk-software-benchmarked-for-fastest-read-and-write-speed/#comment-505630</link>
		<dc:creator>Fortigurn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 04:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raymond.cc/blog/?p=6671#comment-505630</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m impressed by those scores. My CrystalMark score using a 5GB ramdrive created with DataRAM&#039;s product was much lower, only 90MB/s. Could it be that I need to tweak the setting somehow?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m impressed by those scores. My CrystalMark score using a 5GB ramdrive created with DataRAM&#8217;s product was much lower, only 90MB/s. Could it be that I need to tweak the setting somehow?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/12-ram-disk-software-benchmarked-for-fastest-read-and-write-speed/#comment-492875</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 20:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raymond.cc/blog/?p=6671#comment-492875</guid>
		<description>Raymond,

Have you tried out SuperSpeed&#039;s RamDisk (or RamDiskPlus) software? I was wondering how it compared to the other 12 versions you tested. It is not shareware or freeware, but I am still old school and believe you get what you pay for. The SuperSpeed version supports up to 512 GB of RAM disk, which is the sort of capability I need. Most of the others I&#039;ve looked at only support &quot;small&quot; RamDisks. THANKS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raymond,</p>
<p>Have you tried out SuperSpeed&#8217;s RamDisk (or RamDiskPlus) software? I was wondering how it compared to the other 12 versions you tested. It is not shareware or freeware, but I am still old school and believe you get what you pay for. The SuperSpeed version supports up to 512 GB of RAM disk, which is the sort of capability I need. Most of the others I&#8217;ve looked at only support &#8220;small&#8221; RamDisks. THANKS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 272/273 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.raymond.cc

Served from: www.raymond.cc @ 2012-02-11 08:04:55 -->
