25 Aug

Try comparing the 2 images below and see if you can spot any difference. The left one is original image and the right one is the signed image. I bet you can’t find any difference at all or notice any invisible watermarking.

Embedding an invisible signature using SignMyImage is very easy. All you need to do is load an image to the program, click Sign at the menu bar and select Sign Image. You get to enter your sign which must be less than 10 characters. When the signing has completed, just save the image to a new filename or you can replace the existing one.

The only drawback for SignMyImage is its shareware that cost 14,99 Euros. You can use it for free to watermark images with invisible signature but you cannot use the batch processing feature and every watermarked image will be signed by a visible stamp to right-bottom corner. An idea to overcome the stamp is to maybe add a few pixels of empty space at the bottom so that the program stamps it at an empty area which can be cropped. Paid user also gets to access the Image Spider. Image Spider is a web crawler, that searches through whole internet for signed images. If it finds a signed image, the owner of the image will be noticed.
[tags]image, watermark, invisible, photo, copyright[/tags]
: Copying this article to your website is strictly NOT allowed. However, if you like this article, you can use the HTML code below to directly link to this article.
Detect Invisible Users on Yahoo Messenger Latest ICQ Newest Invisibility Checker FREE 1 Year a-squared Anti-Malware Genuine License for EVERYONE Impressive ZEMANA AntiLogger Proactive Protection + Free 1 Year License FREE Mamutu v2 (ThreatFire Alternative) Genuine License Worth $27 for EVERYONE Loading Unsigned Drivers in Windows 7 and Vista 64-bit (x64) Check ICQ invisibility status with NIC
Have computer technical problems? Get FREE help from Raymond.CC FORUM
how does the invisible signature stop people from taking a photo and doing what they want with it like the watermarking does?
It doesn’t stop people from stealing your image… just let you proof the image was from you, just like watermark.
Is there even a way to “stop” people from stealing an image if you put it out for public to view? I don’t think so…
yeah, if u can view it, it means you downloaded it.
you have it.
The best way to protect your images is not to capture it in the first place. This is better than nothing and watermarking across your image is just plain ugly. Thanks Raymond for this tip!!
sorry but so you can not show that it is a protected image
(???)
U can still copy it using adobe…
I tested this program by using Snagit to capture an image that I protected with SignMyImage. When I used the program to detect the sign in the image, it didn’t see the sign that I inserted.
It seems SignMyImage will only detect the sign if you save the image, and not when capturing image softwares are used.
This program can still be useful, when your image on the internet is saved by someone and not captured.
Thanks Raymond.
This is an interesting idea, just like digimarc, that also applies an invisible watermark, but you can also make it noticeable.
From all these comments it doesn’t seem people really under the concept. As a photographer myself, I’d rather have a visible watermark, that way it helps to deter them from downloading it since they know it will distort the image when trying to photoshop it out.
But then again – you don’t watermark any high resolution image, you always keep the original and optimize the new one for web so it’s small. Then if someone does try to say the image is theirs, well, you have the original as proof and they have nothing.
Good Post Ray.
People can still copy it, but if you pay and also have the image spider, you can find anyone who is using it without your permission and ask them to take it down.
Also, I don’t know if anyone ever takes legal action against people for stealing their images, but this would be a way to have proof that it was stolen.
This is nothing but Steganography, it means it is a method of hiding information within another piece of information. Its different from Cryptography because in Cryptography you know that there is some information that is protected, but in this you try to hide the information inside another. That is here the image acts as a envelope to the info inside, that is here your signature (nothing but some alphabets). In fact we did the same for time pass. I can actually send text in a image, image in a image, and supports a variety of images. Of course we didn’t provide mass/bulk processing of many files, as our objective was different, secret conversation within a group. We even added crypto techniques to it, so the message is even protected by a password. So even if someone extracts the message out of the picture, it will be in encrypted form and you cannot see it unless you have the password, or else for broadcast you can turn off the encryption feature. It supported many forms of protection. I will add the mass/bulk processing of files and I will post it or share it on sourceforge. Some of you guys may find it useful.
@wutzup – if you use snagit to capture the image, of course you won’t see his name or website name because there is no meta dad included in a screenshot of the image. Now, if you were to upload that to flickr then most likely you will see that in the included meta data it will have raymond-cc . Capturing a screenshot does NOT include Meta Data
@hfng that’s just pointless to say. “don’t capture it”…that doesn’t protect anything…
@exhno – You can also use tineye.com to search for your images if you think people are using them. It is indexed daily with new photos and FREE to use – you don’t need a watermark, visible or invisible to to get indexed.
The only real problem is that most people don’t check (nor care really) if other people have encrypted some sort of data into the picture to show who owns it. Most cases, those pictures can be re-authenticated and someone else can put that hidden watermark on it. Like others have said, this only works if you download the file, itself and not if you took like a screencapture program to grab the picture.
More or less, this would be great to use in addition to a normal watermark because as far as I see, that watermark doesn’t include a date on it. Even if it did, it is still very easy to fake a date no matter were you want to capture it from (Windows clock, Motherboard clock, Google’s date/time, etc…).
Hi I found this discussion about SMI, that I created. Just few words. There is no information written to metadata. The information is in the image data directly. If you snap it the signature should be preserved. It of course depends on viewing zoom, crop and jpeg compression. The signature should persist up to 50% zoom, some crop and jpeg upto 60% generally. The signature is removable of course, especially if you have a program that tells you if the signature is there or not.
I prefer unobtrusive visible watermarks to invisible ones. Please tell me how an invisible watermark can protect you against someone for example pushing PrintScreen, pasting an image into graphics editor and then using your picture as his\her own? That’s why I use visible watermarks. I advice to try Bytescout Watermarking – the watermarks it applies are so nice looking that they don’t spoil the picture. I usually make watermarks almost transparent – my picture remains nice and becomes protected.
Ok, easy sample. Lets consider grayscale image that has in the first row 5 pixels with intensity 134,122,155,128,124. Lets consider simple coding schema, that will hide five bits of information to these five pixels: if intensity is odd, the bit of information is set to 1 if is even the bit is 0. We want to encode informatiom 11101 so the intensities are modified to: 135,123,155,128,125. If you print screen and paste it again the intensities remain the same! and the information will be decoded correctly:
135 is odd = 1
123 = 1
155 = 1
128 is even = 0
125 is odd = 1
and that is the information we hid in the image :-)
Filip
Now this is amazing
Use a software for usual watermarking….plus this for the invisible watermarking.
Nice useful post, Ray. Waiting for a SingMyImage freebie to be posted on this site ;->
So, how do I place the stamp on my photographs for my customers like Otis Mills does?
Lo que a mí me gustaría en realidad es poner una imágen invisible sobre una fotografía…
Hasta hoy no sé como se puede hacer así que si alguien tiene alguna información, le agradecería me dijera.