23 Nov

1. Acronis True Image Home 2010 (build 6.029) – Website
2. Active@ Disk Image v3.34 – Website
3. DriveClone Pro v7 – Website
4. Macrium Reflect v4.2 Build 2028 Full Edition – Website
5. Norton Ghost v15 – Website
6. O&O DiskImage Professional v4.1 Build 47 – Website
7. Paragon Drive Backup v9 Professional Build 8681 – Website
8. R-Drive Image v4.6 Build 4601 – Website
9. Windows 7 built-in Disk Imaging
10. StorageCraft ShadowProtect Desktop Edition v3.5 – Website
The testing was done on my desktop computer:
CPU: Intel Pentium D 2.80GHz
Mainboard: MSI 945P Platinum
Memory: 2GB DDR2
Hard Drive 1: 160GB 7200RPM 8MB Cache SATA 3.0Gb/s (Windows 7),
Hard Drive 2: 250GB 7200RPM 8MB Cache SATA 1.5Gb/s (Backup Location)
I wasn’t able to fully test Active@ Disk Image because the recovery disk feature is not available in the trial version. I emailed them to request for a full version to review but never gotten any reply from them.
Ghost 14 didn’t support Windows 7, so I waited for Ghost 15. When Ghost 15 was officially released last week, they said that they currently do not have any free copies available for the press. So I went ahead and paid $69.99 to purchase a full version for testing.
After finished testing Ghost 15, I then found out Paragon has recently replaced their Drive Backup Professional 9 with Backup & Recovery 10 Suite. I’ve requested for a full trial version and they seemed to be quite reluctant to provide me with a version that I can fully test on. I’d very much like to test and include Paragon Backup & Recovery 10 Suite in the review, but unfortunately I do not have the funds to buy the full version. If they ever provide me with a full version, I will surely update this review.
Macrium, O&O and StorageCraft happily provided me with full version for testing without any delays. I managed to “find” the full version of Acronis, DriveClone, Paragon 9 and R-Drive so I didn’t have to contact them and can’t tell if their support is good or not.
All disk imaging software includes mount/unmount image, verify/validate image, scheduler for automatic creation of backup disk images, raw imaging (sector to sector), and support for Windows 7. So I will not include this 5 features to the comparison table below.
Features Comparison (Click to open image at new window)
Features Explanation:
1: Boot Menu = The imaging software adds the program to Windows start-up boot menu allowing you to run the software for backup/restore without booting in Windows or using the Rescue Disk.

2. Constant Backup = Able to automatically create non-stop backup every X minutes
3. Virtual Environment = Risk free environment for testing of new software or visiting websites with potentially dangerous content.
4. Restore to Different Hardware PC = In another words, it’s called Universal Restore. You can restore the backup image onto another computer without having the same hardware.
Disk Imaging and Restoration Speed (Click to open image at new window)
Here are some notes on the tests and rules of disk imaging:
- The disk imaging backup process is tested with default settings.
- Acronis Online Backup is not available for all countries yet. First 25GB cost $4.95 per month or $49.95 per year. Ever 5GB storage increment cost $0.79 per month or $9.49 per year.
- You can create a full image backup on the Windows where you’re logged on.
- You cannot perform full restoration on the Windows you are logged on. Restoration can only be done with Rescue Disk or Boot Menu where Windows on the hard drive is not loaded.
- Macrium has finally added the ability to create image backup using Rescue Disk but only for Windows PE v2.1.200 and above only. It’s a little buggy because the Rescue Disk backup compression doesn’t seems to compress as good as Macrium running in Windows and it also takes more time.
From the test that I’ve done, I can easily see that there is an obvious winner and that is Acronis TrueImage Home 2010! Acronis is able to backup and restore with very fast speed and also packed with a lot of features that cannot be found on other disk imaging software. Most importantly, the price is reasonable and doesn’t cost ridiculously expensive like its competitors. StorageCraft has the best backup and restore speed with a lot of features but it’s the most expensive.
[tags]image, backup, restore, ghost, acronis[/tags]
: Copying this article to your website is strictly NOT allowed. However, if you like this article, you can use the HTML code below to directly link to this article.
Best Free Windows Disk Defragmenter in Terms of Features, Performance and Speed How To Create Full Windows Backup by Imaging Without Using Norton Ghost Boost Disk Drive Performance In Windows Vista Make Full Backup of Your Ipod, USB Flash Drive and MP3 Players By Imaging Find and Remove Duplicate Files to Free Up Hard Disk Space EASEUS Todo Backup Free Disk Imaging Software (Norton Ghost Alternative) Measure Actual Hard Disk Performance Under Windows
Have computer technical problems? Get FREE help from Raymond.CC FORUM
I have to agree with everyone wondering why Image For Windows didn’t make it? I know you can’t have ALL imaging programs in a test, but it for sure is strange to leave such a popular software out in favor of less known, less efficient ones?
Nice article, thanks. I’ve been researching backup software for a few months now, and I would recommend reviewing Symantec Backup Exec System Recovery next time around. It’s my second choice behind Acronis.
EMC Retrospect (with the Disaster Recovery add-on) is another option I tested, but the recovery process is too flaky for serious use. The next version announced supposedly has a revamped PE-based recovery system, at which time it would be worth a second look (the Retrospect UI is very flexible.)
Been using Acronis True Image for several years and I have nothing but compliments. One I like is the ability to do full backup (no shcheduled backups) by just using it’s rescue media
I have used Acronis very difficult to use & can be very unreliable if you don’t understand the program perfectly. Paragon is a very Good software & there are some free versions floating around the web. Shadow protectr desktop is totally reliable & has never failed . It acan be totally be run from the rescue. The one time I tried Drive Snapshot which by the way is expensive it did not work & hrew up some error codes. Terrabytes programs are probably to complicated for most people to handle.
Thanks Raymond. I’ve already tried 3 of the ones on your list. For the record, I always experience 2 to 3 Hard Disk failures annually. I bet these tools should be very helpful. :)
I use Eaz-Fix. It is simply amazing. It takes a snapshot of my c drive, which contains my Windows installation. D drive contains my data. It takes around 10-20 seconds to take a snapshot. It has now been 10 months since I did the baseline and I have about 30 programs that I have tested out during the last 10 months. So when I want to return to a clean machine, I reboot, hit the Home button, select the baseline and in the time it takes for me to reboot I have a brand new Windows. I then update my Windows and redo my baseline.
Get this. My colleage went to West Africa. He took his small Dell laptop along. He also uses Eaz-Fix. While there his hard disk was giving him serious problems. It crashed, or so to say, trashed Windows. He rebooted, went back to his last snapshot and was away again. He then set a new snapshot at the end of each day. Get this, this happened over 20 times before he returned to Dubai and was able to get a new hard drive. He couldn’t have made it through the African visit without Eaz-Fix.
Eaz-Fix can also burn an image of your hd and save it to external media in case your hd does come to its final resting place someday.
I wouldn’t waste my time with the above after using Eaz-Fix. Unless I am not understanding some of the bells and whistles above. True, if you need an online back up your system then something else would be better than Eaz-Fix.
Cheers.
Nice blog entry! I suggest you expand this in the future with some serious testing details. When evaluating some of these products, we quickly realized that incremental backup capability was a necessity for our business, because our servers became unacceptably unresponsive without incrementals. Differentials were not even acceptable. This narrowed the field quite a bit for us, to those few which support quick incremental backups. A home computer may not be seriously affected by such slowdowns, but businesses should keep this effect in mind – incrementals are the only decent option. There are other concerns too, with incrementals. Some products have serious problems with incrementals (read their support websites). We found in our tests only the StorageCraft ShadowProtect product was consistently reliable for incremental imaging. However we are using Server 2003, and even StorageCraft has had some issues with incrementals as they just released an update to fix some issues which are mainly seen on Vista and Server 2008 and Windows 7 and Server 2008R2. I would be very interested in hearing about the experiences of other users who are using StorageCraft ShadowProtect on Windows 7 and Server 2008R2. We will be migrating in the near future to these platforms and would like to know if the ShadowProtect incremental backups are working correctly on these platforms with their latest 3.5.1 release.
Acronis is flaky and support is soooooooo bad.
Check out the forums.
http://forum.acronis.com/forums/acronis-discussion-forums/acronis-true-image-forum
Hi Raymond,
Thanks for the unbiased review on Disk Imaging software. There are many different programs to choose from but i prefer Acronis TrueImage.
I used to use PowerQuest DriveImage 7 (WinXP only!) and never had any issues. I have used Acronis TrueImage for a couple of years now. It is very easy to use and i have never had any problems or corrupted restore images. When using the bootable recovery CD, i always save my backup images to a 16GB USB flash stick and always set it to “validate the image file” if it passes then i burn them to a DVD-RW later when i have time and validate the burnt DVD just to make sure it’s ok, then i delete the file on my USB stick.
Regards,
Jon
Why compare Shadowprotect 3.5?
Shadowprotect 4 has been released, amazingly better.
Raymond, can you compare the rest with this new protect?
I’m currently researching what product I wish to buy for my personal use. And, I’ve noticed some additional information.
I have heard of one important feature of ShadowProtect that you’ve failed to mention. (Note: My information may be dated, but comes from PC Magazine, so should be reasonably reliable.)
Changing a motherboard or video card, but keeping your old drive can leave you with a computer that won’t boot without a complete strip-down and re-installation of Windows. (I know this from personal experience.) According to PC Magazine, Storagecraft has found a way to deal with these hardware issues and incorporated it into ShadowProtect. And, apparently none of the others have such a feature. When the other products mention hardware independence, they are speaking of the disk drive and not the full system.
Thus, if you wish to upgrade your system hardware (especially the motherboard) without changing over your familiar drive setup, you may want to take an extra look at ShadowProtect.
Also, as I understand it, Paragon’s full Disk Manager Suite (more expensive) reportedly contains the most comprehensive set of tools currently out there … and the price has dropped dramatically. If you need addtional partitioning tools, you may want to look at that. Disk Manager Suite includes Drive Backup.
I saw Power Quest Drive Image 7 mentioned in the above comments. My work also used Drive Image and never had a problem with it. However, that product was purchased by Symantec a long time ago and became the basis of Norton Ghost 9.0. We switched to Acronis at the time, as we’d found a significant system performance penalty installing any Symantec product. We had little problem with Acronis, but the version we were using was not the easiest to use.