<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Best Performing (Speed and Memory Usage) Antivirus and Internet Security for 2010</title> <atom:link href="http://www.raymond.cc/blog/best-performing-speed-and-memory-usage-antivirus-and-internet-security-for-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/best-performing-speed-and-memory-usage-antivirus-and-internet-security-for-2010/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=best-performing-speed-and-memory-usage-antivirus-and-internet-security-for-2010</link> <description>Daily updated news of useful advanced computer tips and tricks</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 01:07:25 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/><xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Martian</title><link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/best-performing-speed-and-memory-usage-antivirus-and-internet-security-for-2010/#comment-509879</link> <dc:creator>Martian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 22:21:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raymond.cc/blog/?p=6900#comment-509879</guid> <description>The KV web site contains spyware. Stay away from KV Antivirus.
Spyware Terminator seems to be working well on my netbook. Updates are fast.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The KV web site contains spyware. Stay away from KV Antivirus.<br
/> Spyware Terminator seems to be working well on my netbook. Updates are fast.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Waldir</title><link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/best-performing-speed-and-memory-usage-antivirus-and-internet-security-for-2010/#comment-509833</link> <dc:creator>Waldir</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 23:40:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raymond.cc/blog/?p=6900#comment-509833</guid> <description>I&#039;m with Expectus here... where&#039;s the conclusion? Thanks a lot for all the data, but as they&#039;re images we can&#039;t even copy it to calculate the final score on our own... A roundup would really add to the value of this article :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Expectus here&#8230; where&#8217;s the conclusion? Thanks a lot for all the data, but as they&#8217;re images we can&#8217;t even copy it to calculate the final score on our own&#8230; A roundup would really add to the value of this article :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: t0mm1</title><link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/best-performing-speed-and-memory-usage-antivirus-and-internet-security-for-2010/#comment-506757</link> <dc:creator>t0mm1</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 12:24:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raymond.cc/blog/?p=6900#comment-506757</guid> <description>I dont think all these criterias describes the best AV program.
You cant say that program X is better because it is faster.
I would choose slower, if it could guarantee me to clean all viruses.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont think all these criterias describes the best AV program.<br
/> You cant say that program X is better because it is faster.<br
/> I would choose slower, if it could guarantee me to clean all viruses.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Expectus</title><link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/best-performing-speed-and-memory-usage-antivirus-and-internet-security-for-2010/#comment-506533</link> <dc:creator>Expectus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 11:51:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raymond.cc/blog/?p=6900#comment-506533</guid> <description>Dude, show us the overall best performing speed and memory usage on ur own advise...that would be a good help...thanks mate...its not easy to do that but i know you would indeed you already did the above thanks alot!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, show us the overall best performing speed and memory usage on ur own advise&#8230;that would be a good help&#8230;thanks mate&#8230;its not easy to do that but i know you would indeed you already did the above thanks alot!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Violator</title><link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/best-performing-speed-and-memory-usage-antivirus-and-internet-security-for-2010/#comment-505937</link> <dc:creator>Violator</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:25:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raymond.cc/blog/?p=6900#comment-505937</guid> <description>Since the title of this test regards performance, where are the numbers for DPC Latency, Hard Page Faults etc?How did you test boot times?
I suggest that you use BootTimer, which takes the time for a complete restart, which means it records the time it takes from you click ok until the last startup application is loaded after the restart.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the title of this test regards performance, where are the numbers for DPC Latency, Hard Page Faults etc?</p><p>How did you test boot times?<br
/> I suggest that you use BootTimer, which takes the time for a complete restart, which means it records the time it takes from you click ok until the last startup application is loaded after the restart.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: guest</title><link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/best-performing-speed-and-memory-usage-antivirus-and-internet-security-for-2010/#comment-494153</link> <dc:creator>guest</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 08:45:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raymond.cc/blog/?p=6900#comment-494153</guid> <description>Your results are close to my observations but has two holes.
One are memory graphs. I don&#039;t see real memory compsuption. Please add also graph with virtual memory allocation from task manager which shows real memory used by antivir.Second hole is boot time. Real boot time are longer because some antivirs like Microsoft Essentials loads after windows pulpit is on shown. It sometimes takes a lot of time - in this time processor is used in 99%. So the real boot time is time to cpu  load&lt;1%</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your results are close to my observations but has two holes.<br
/> One are memory graphs. I don&#8217;t see real memory compsuption. Please add also graph with virtual memory allocation from task manager which shows real memory used by antivir.</p><p>Second hole is boot time. Real boot time are longer because some antivirs like Microsoft Essentials loads after windows pulpit is on shown. It sometimes takes a lot of time &#8211; in this time processor is used in 99%. So the real boot time is time to cpu  load&lt;1%</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kúrógép</title><link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/best-performing-speed-and-memory-usage-antivirus-and-internet-security-for-2010/#comment-493052</link> <dc:creator>Kúrógép</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 13:28:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raymond.cc/blog/?p=6900#comment-493052</guid> <description>Megbaszom a szátokat.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Megbaszom a szátokat.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
