<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: How Much Memory Does a WebPage in a Tab Take Up in Web Browser?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.raymond.cc/blog/how-much-memory-does-a-webpage-in-a-tab-take-up-in-web-browser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/how-much-memory-does-a-webpage-in-a-tab-take-up-in-web-browser/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=how-much-memory-does-a-webpage-in-a-tab-take-up-in-web-browser</link> <description>Daily updated news of useful advanced computer tips and tricks</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 15:54:13 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/><xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Stinky23</title><link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/how-much-memory-does-a-webpage-in-a-tab-take-up-in-web-browser/#comment-454402</link> <dc:creator>Stinky23</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:46:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raymond.cc/blog/?p=1734#comment-454402</guid> <description>Wine Gums so the action immediately struck me as out of character. ,</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wine Gums so the action immediately struck me as out of character. ,</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: hebele hubele</title><link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/how-much-memory-does-a-webpage-in-a-tab-take-up-in-web-browser/#comment-409623</link> <dc:creator>hebele hubele</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 11:51:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raymond.cc/blog/?p=1734#comment-409623</guid> <description>if u open more than 30 tab on windows use should use firefox tinymenu+abp+tabmixplus (dont forfget tab size 30, and row3)if u open more than 500-1000 (thousand) u are only 1 choice its minefield x64 (its ff 64), its too powerful browser ever,
i have 2gig ram, its open 1500+ tab 1week ..alotof ext. not working in minefield but u ar install  tightly tools, then all extension working..recommend win 2003x64 not sh*** 08/vista**if virtualmemory can be 2gigs or more u cant use yourfirefox normaly.. in firefox 0.9 can open 700+tab in 2gig VM, ff2 is  open 100~300~ normaly .. sh**ff3 can ??? garbage! too quicly virtual memory eat..</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if u open more than 30 tab on windows use should use firefox tinymenu+abp+tabmixplus (dont forfget tab size 30, and row3)</p><p>if u open more than 500-1000 (thousand) u are only 1 choice its minefield x64 (its ff 64), its too powerful browser ever,<br
/> i have 2gig ram, its open 1500+ tab 1week ..</p><p>alotof ext. not working in minefield but u ar install  tightly tools, then all extension working..</p><p>recommend win 2003&#215;64 not sh*** 08/vista</p><p>**if virtualmemory can be 2gigs or more u cant use yourfirefox normaly.. in firefox 0.9 can open 700+tab in 2gig VM, ff2 is  open 100~300~ normaly .. sh**ff3 can ??? garbage! too quicly virtual memory eat..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: megablue</title><link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/how-much-memory-does-a-webpage-in-a-tab-take-up-in-web-browser/#comment-401142</link> <dc:creator>megablue</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 01:05:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raymond.cc/blog/?p=1734#comment-401142</guid> <description>@raymond
It is impossible for Firefox to implement process manager as Chrome because Firefox is single threaded (not entirely true but most of the rendering and processing restricted within a thread) unless they change the architecture of the software design.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@raymond<br
/> It is impossible for Firefox to implement process manager as Chrome because Firefox is single threaded (not entirely true but most of the rendering and processing restricted within a thread) unless they change the architecture of the software design.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: john</title><link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/how-much-memory-does-a-webpage-in-a-tab-take-up-in-web-browser/#comment-400939</link> <dc:creator>john</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:38:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raymond.cc/blog/?p=1734#comment-400939</guid> <description>without any doubt Firefox is the leading browser in the globe. It was first to have open source everyone got so used to it that today G.Crome is just an ordinary browser to all of us. Even if it is memory hungry. They will fix it.
Google really helped fire fox to take lead from IE of microsoft. They are doing fine and we all are happy with it that makes the difference.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>without any doubt Firefox is the leading browser in the globe. It was first to have open source everyone got so used to it that today G.Crome is just an ordinary browser to all of us. Even if it is memory hungry. They will fix it.<br
/> Google really helped fire fox to take lead from IE of microsoft. They are doing fine and we all are happy with it that makes the difference.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: aBg_rOnGak</title><link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/how-much-memory-does-a-webpage-in-a-tab-take-up-in-web-browser/#comment-400899</link> <dc:creator>aBg_rOnGak</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 07:20:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raymond.cc/blog/?p=1734#comment-400899</guid> <description>I\&#039;m using Firefox Ultimate Optimizer...and so far, it\&#039;s been great</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I\&#8217;m using Firefox Ultimate Optimizer&#8230;and so far, it\&#8217;s been great</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Blackrose</title><link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/how-much-memory-does-a-webpage-in-a-tab-take-up-in-web-browser/#comment-400859</link> <dc:creator>Blackrose</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:51:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raymond.cc/blog/?p=1734#comment-400859</guid> <description>G chrome is faster than FF and IE. I am not used to Chrome. Opera is the best.Waiting for new version of Opera. Great browser.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G chrome is faster than FF and IE. I am not used to Chrome. Opera is the best.</p><p>Waiting for new version of Opera. Great browser.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ernest Lane</title><link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/how-much-memory-does-a-webpage-in-a-tab-take-up-in-web-browser/#comment-400858</link> <dc:creator>Ernest Lane</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:21:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raymond.cc/blog/?p=1734#comment-400858</guid> <description>The thing I like best about Firefox is the customization, the extensive range of add-ons.  Do you think the final version of Chrome will have that capability, and will doing extensions for Chrome be as popular as doing them for Firefox?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing I like best about Firefox is the customization, the extensive range of add-ons.  Do you think the final version of Chrome will have that capability, and will doing extensions for Chrome be as popular as doing them for Firefox?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
