<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: NetStumbler Alternative for Vista and 64-bit XP to Scan Hidden Wi-Fi</title> <atom:link href="http://www.raymond.cc/blog/netstumbler-alternative-for-vista-and-64-bit-xp-to-scan-hidden-wi-fi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/netstumbler-alternative-for-vista-and-64-bit-xp-to-scan-hidden-wi-fi/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=netstumbler-alternative-for-vista-and-64-bit-xp-to-scan-hidden-wi-fi</link> <description>Daily updated news of useful advanced computer tips and tricks</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 15:54:13 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/><xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: rajko</title><link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/netstumbler-alternative-for-vista-and-64-bit-xp-to-scan-hidden-wi-fi/#comment-489032</link> <dc:creator>rajko</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 05:59:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raymond.cc/blog/?p=3547#comment-489032</guid> <description>Hi all,Do you have any update in 2010?
Especially in relation to W7.Thank you,
Rajko</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all,</p><p>Do you have any update in 2010?<br
/> Especially in relation to W7.</p><p>Thank you,<br
/> Rajko</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jcym</title><link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/netstumbler-alternative-for-vista-and-64-bit-xp-to-scan-hidden-wi-fi/#comment-422104</link> <dc:creator>Jcym</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:28:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raymond.cc/blog/?p=3547#comment-422104</guid> <description>HI again, that appears to confirm it as the post preceding this one with the test sentence at the end displayed the apostrophe correctly without the forward slashes and didn&#039;t ask me to enter a captcha. Something in your captcha page script appears to be messing things up.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI again, that appears to confirm it as the post preceding this one with the test sentence at the end displayed the apostrophe correctly without the forward slashes and didn&#8217;t ask me to enter a captcha. Something in your captcha page script appears to be messing things up.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jcym</title><link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/netstumbler-alternative-for-vista-and-64-bit-xp-to-scan-hidden-wi-fi/#comment-422103</link> <dc:creator>Jcym</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:24:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raymond.cc/blog/?p=3547#comment-422103</guid> <description>BTW Raymond, out of curiosity, can you tell me why when I use an apostrophe it prints 7 forward slashes after the word and immediately before the apostrophe. Is it my end or your end. Then again, I think it might be your end as my first post has it displayed correctly with the apostrophe after Nirsoft and before the s with no forward slashes. The slashes only appear in my post immediately before this one. The first (and second post as well) didn&#039;t require me to enter a captcha while the last post with the 7 forward slashes and an apostrophe did require me to enter a captcha so I am wondering if there is something in the script that handles the captcha page messing something up. Not a biggy, just naturally curious :)Testing, testing, this sentence contains a word with an apostrophe to see if it&#039;s still happening.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW Raymond, out of curiosity, can you tell me why when I use an apostrophe it prints 7 forward slashes after the word and immediately before the apostrophe. Is it my end or your end. Then again, I think it might be your end as my first post has it displayed correctly with the apostrophe after Nirsoft and before the s with no forward slashes. The slashes only appear in my post immediately before this one. The first (and second post as well) didn&#8217;t require me to enter a captcha while the last post with the 7 forward slashes and an apostrophe did require me to enter a captcha so I am wondering if there is something in the script that handles the captcha page messing something up. Not a biggy, just naturally curious :)</p><p>Testing, testing, this sentence contains a word with an apostrophe to see if it&#8217;s still happening.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jcym</title><link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/netstumbler-alternative-for-vista-and-64-bit-xp-to-scan-hidden-wi-fi/#comment-422101</link> <dc:creator>Jcym</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:25:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raymond.cc/blog/?p=3547#comment-422101</guid> <description>What do you mean by hidden, no SSID? If so, I can see them fine, I have a couple of them viewable at the moment. They just show no label in the SSID column but the rest of the info is there.The only major difference I can see is that inSSIDer graphs RSSI, which definitely has its uses, and also shows the speed while the Nirsoft tool doesn\\\\\\\&#039;t. Though the latter may be because I have my wireless locked so as to ignore everything but G on my network. When I have the time I will switch over to All (i.e. A through G) to see what additional networks I see.I would say that the main advantage WirelessNetView has is that it doesn\\\\\\\&#039;t need installing, i.e. can be run from a stick or external drive, will pick up your active wireless card automatically and with oui.txt added, is only 66KB unzipped.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you mean by hidden, no SSID? If so, I can see them fine, I have a couple of them viewable at the moment. They just show no label in the SSID column but the rest of the info is there.</p><p>The only major difference I can see is that inSSIDer graphs RSSI, which definitely has its uses, and also shows the speed while the Nirsoft tool doesn\\\\\\\&#8217;t. Though the latter may be because I have my wireless locked so as to ignore everything but G on my network. When I have the time I will switch over to All (i.e. A through G) to see what additional networks I see.</p><p>I would say that the main advantage WirelessNetView has is that it doesn\\\\\\\&#8217;t need installing, i.e. can be run from a stick or external drive, will pick up your active wireless card automatically and with oui.txt added, is only 66KB unzipped.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Raymond</title><link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/netstumbler-alternative-for-vista-and-64-bit-xp-to-scan-hidden-wi-fi/#comment-422070</link> <dc:creator>Raymond</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:55:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raymond.cc/blog/?p=3547#comment-422070</guid> <description>Ooops, got confused about that. Didn&#039;t know that there&#039;s a Wireless&quot;NET&quot;view. I thought it was the keyview :PHmmm, WirelessNetView is unable to find hidden network?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooops, got confused about that. Didn&#8217;t know that there&#8217;s a Wireless&#8221;NET&#8221;view. I thought it was the keyview :P</p><p>Hmmm, WirelessNetView is unable to find hidden network?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jcym</title><link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/netstumbler-alternative-for-vista-and-64-bit-xp-to-scan-hidden-wi-fi/#comment-422067</link> <dc:creator>Jcym</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:20:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raymond.cc/blog/?p=3547#comment-422067</guid> <description>Raymond, sorry but no, click the link I gave and see for yourself, WirelessNetView is a sniffer. In fact I am looking at it on one of my tablets at this very moment showing me the 8 other wireless networks accessible from my flat. You are thinking of WirelessKeyView.BTW, if you do try it scroll down the Nirsoft page and get oui.txt and add it to WirelessNetView&#039;s folder. This adds another column showing the makers name for the wireless networks sniffed.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raymond, sorry but no, click the link I gave and see for yourself, WirelessNetView is a sniffer. In fact I am looking at it on one of my tablets at this very moment showing me the 8 other wireless networks accessible from my flat. You are thinking of WirelessKeyView.</p><p>BTW, if you do try it scroll down the Nirsoft page and get oui.txt and add it to WirelessNetView&#8217;s folder. This adds another column showing the makers name for the wireless networks sniffed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mojo</title><link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/netstumbler-alternative-for-vista-and-64-bit-xp-to-scan-hidden-wi-fi/#comment-421978</link> <dc:creator>mojo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 21:38:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raymond.cc/blog/?p=3547#comment-421978</guid> <description>I&#039;d like to know how to crack wep in vista x64. thanks</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to know how to crack wep in vista x64. thanks</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
