<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: NoVirusThanks is a Free Multi-Engine Anti-Virus Files Scanner</title> <atom:link href="http://www.raymond.cc/blog/novirusthanks-is-a-free-multi-engine-anti-virus-files-scanner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/novirusthanks-is-a-free-multi-engine-anti-virus-files-scanner/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=novirusthanks-is-a-free-multi-engine-anti-virus-files-scanner</link> <description>Daily updated news of useful advanced computer tips and tricks</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 15:54:13 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/><xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Navjot Singh</title><link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/novirusthanks-is-a-free-multi-engine-anti-virus-files-scanner/#comment-442659</link> <dc:creator>Navjot Singh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:31:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raymond.cc/blog/?p=2261#comment-442659</guid> <description>Kasperky 2010 itself detects the NVTUploader.exe as a trojan: HEUR:Trojan.Win32.Generic
LOL!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kasperky 2010 itself detects the NVTUploader.exe as a trojan: HEUR:Trojan.Win32.Generic<br
/> LOL!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: RAHUL SHARMA</title><link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/novirusthanks-is-a-free-multi-engine-anti-virus-files-scanner/#comment-411731</link> <dc:creator>RAHUL SHARMA</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:52:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raymond.cc/blog/?p=2261#comment-411731</guid> <description>my pen drive have a file named funny scandalUTS.AVI.EXE file in hide forms &amp; is not deleted</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my pen drive have a file named funny scandalUTS.AVI.EXE file in hide forms &amp; is not deleted</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kaily</title><link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/novirusthanks-is-a-free-multi-engine-anti-virus-files-scanner/#comment-406570</link> <dc:creator>Kaily</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 22:04:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raymond.cc/blog/?p=2261#comment-406570</guid> <description>Thanxxxxx Raymond!
The &#039;Binder Detector&#039; of the site detected two piratebay torrentsz setup.exe!!!
You saved me!Thx!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanxxxxx Raymond!<br
/> The &#8216;Binder Detector&#8217; of the site detected two piratebay torrentsz setup.exe!!!<br
/> You saved me!Thx!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kankan</title><link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/novirusthanks-is-a-free-multi-engine-anti-virus-files-scanner/#comment-406537</link> <dc:creator>kankan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 13:59:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raymond.cc/blog/?p=2261#comment-406537</guid> <description>hi !! raymond...my pendrive containing a folder namly &quot;data penting.exe&quot;
each time i delete it..it copied itself..
i tried to delete it using &quot;bitdefender total security 2008&quot;  ...but in vain..
is it a virus/spyware??
how 2 remove it??thanks</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi !! raymond&#8230;</p><p>my pendrive containing a folder namly &#8220;data penting.exe&#8221;<br
/> each time i delete it..it copied itself..<br
/> i tried to delete it using &#8220;bitdefender total security 2008&#8243;  &#8230;but in vain..<br
/> is it a virus/spyware??<br
/> how 2 remove it??</p><p>thanks</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Raymond</title><link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/novirusthanks-is-a-free-multi-engine-anti-virus-files-scanner/#comment-406424</link> <dc:creator>Raymond</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:22:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raymond.cc/blog/?p=2261#comment-406424</guid> <description>Hey mohan, I&#039;ve posted about USB Firewall 6 months ago on this blog. Check it out.
raymond.cc/blog/archives/2008/04/24/protect-windows-from-usb-autoruninf-virus-with-usb-firewall/</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey mohan, I&#8217;ve posted about USB Firewall 6 months ago on this blog. Check it out.<br
/> raymond.cc/blog/archives/2008/04/24/protect-windows-from-usb-autoruninf-virus-with-usb-firewall/</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mohan</title><link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/novirusthanks-is-a-free-multi-engine-anti-virus-files-scanner/#comment-406423</link> <dc:creator>mohan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:10:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raymond.cc/blog/?p=2261#comment-406423</guid> <description>HI Raymond,
Thanx for this post! When i think about security, i wish to say that, in most cases, if we plug-in a Pendrive, if there is any virus inside, it&#039;ll automatically spread to all drives. There is a tiny tool (&lt;than 2MB) called USB firewall which protects automatic action of the Viruses. You can identify it later by using your AV tools.For more details, plz visit
net-studio.org
Hey Raymond, is this useful?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI Raymond,<br
/> Thanx for this post! When i think about security, i wish to say that, in most cases, if we plug-in a Pendrive, if there is any virus inside, it&#8217;ll automatically spread to all drives. There is a tiny tool (&lt;than 2MB) called USB firewall which protects automatic action of the Viruses. You can identify it later by using your AV tools.For more details, plz visit<br
/> net-studio.org<br
/> Hey Raymond, is this useful?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Fred</title><link>http://www.raymond.cc/blog/novirusthanks-is-a-free-multi-engine-anti-virus-files-scanner/#comment-406378</link> <dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 01:34:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raymond.cc/blog/?p=2261#comment-406378</guid> <description>It looks pretty good as usual with your finds Raymond.
I like the idea of \&#039;Do not distribute the sample\&#039; so I can disable it. I want the sample to be distributed to the anti virus companies in the hope that they will all get better at detection and in the very optimistic hope they will work more closely even if merely to the extent of calling each virus/malware etc the same thing. I.e. you upload a file which you know will probably generate false positives just in case to say Virus total and get six positives each with different names and none of which you can find a decent description of as well as some clean results. So you are no further forward.I do not buy into the idea that \&#039;only\&#039; malware developers were using it, for a start their would be no behavioural analysis, that would best be done on a virtual machines and cannot be done online. Secondly most AV companies offer Demos and/or Online scan\&#039;s anyway. - It sound more like the AV companies are too concerned about protecting their trade secrets and work together as little as possible. I find this really idiotic as most non IT literate people (who form the majority) do not buy AV software based on rational reasons. At work we use AVG (reason unknown - cheap probably), my girlfriend uses Panda because it came with her laptop and she renewed the licence as it had not found any viruses ;) and a friend who is an IT professional bought Norton for his own machine because he \&#039;had heard of it\&#039;. I use Kaspersky because I researched it and believe it to be the best (for me), Esset Nod 32 came a close second.p.s. Obviously do not distribute this sample is sensible  if the file is confidential, otherwise the more the AV companies get the better.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks pretty good as usual with your finds Raymond.<br
/> I like the idea of \&#8217;Do not distribute the sample\&#8217; so I can disable it. I want the sample to be distributed to the anti virus companies in the hope that they will all get better at detection and in the very optimistic hope they will work more closely even if merely to the extent of calling each virus/malware etc the same thing. I.e. you upload a file which you know will probably generate false positives just in case to say Virus total and get six positives each with different names and none of which you can find a decent description of as well as some clean results. So you are no further forward.</p><p>I do not buy into the idea that \&#8217;only\&#8217; malware developers were using it, for a start their would be no behavioural analysis, that would best be done on a virtual machines and cannot be done online. Secondly most AV companies offer Demos and/or Online scan\&#8217;s anyway. &#8211; It sound more like the AV companies are too concerned about protecting their trade secrets and work together as little as possible. I find this really idiotic as most non IT literate people (who form the majority) do not buy AV software based on rational reasons. At work we use AVG (reason unknown &#8211; cheap probably), my girlfriend uses Panda because it came with her laptop and she renewed the licence as it had not found any viruses ;) and a friend who is an IT professional bought Norton for his own machine because he \&#8217;had heard of it\&#8217;. I use Kaspersky because I researched it and believe it to be the best (for me), Esset Nod 32 came a close second.</p><p>p.s. Obviously do not distribute this sample is sensible  if the file is confidential, otherwise the more the AV companies get the better.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
