question about virus result

[mackemking]

I've just ran a crack file through virus total and got the following results...What Im wondering is are these results all totally different viruses? and if they are is there any point in using AV software if different vendors pick up different viruses?

ALSO - im running kaspersky which didnt pick anything up with this exe file!!! should I be worried?

File Patch.exe received on 2009.07.23 16:32:36 (UTC)
Current status: finished
Result: 23/39 (58.98%)

Antivirus Version Last Update Result
a-squared 4.5.0.24 2009.07.23 Virus.Win32.Agent.WOW!IK
AhnLab-V3 5.0.0.2 2009.07.23 Win32/MalPackedB.suspicious
AntiVir 7.9.0.228 2009.07.23 TR/Crypt.XPACK.Gen
Antiy-AVL 2.0.3.7 2009.07.23 -
Authentium 5.1.2.4 2009.07.23 W32/Fujack.U
Avast 4.8.1335.0 2009.07.22 Win32:Trojan-gen {Other}
AVG 8.5.0.387 2009.07.23 Win32/Heur
BitDefender 7.2 2009.07.23 Trojan.Generic.1645874
CAT-QuickHeal 10.00 2009.07.23 Trojan.Agent.ATV
ClamAV 0.94.1 2009.07.23 -
Comodo 1744 2009.07.23 UnclassifiedMalware
DrWeb 5.0.0.12182 2009.07.23 -
eSafe 7.0.17.0 2009.07.23 -
eTrust-Vet 31.6.6635 2009.07.23 -
F-Prot 4.4.4.56 2009.07.23 W32/Fujack.U
F-Secure 8.0.14470.0 2009.07.23 -
Fortinet 3.120.0.0 2009.07.23 -
GData 19 2009.07.23 Trojan.Generic.1645874
Ikarus T3.1.1.64.0 2009.07.23 Virus.Win32.Agent.WOW
Jiangmin 11.0.800 2009.07.23 -
K7AntiVirus 7.10.800 2009.07.23 Trojan.Win32.Malware.1
Kaspersky 7.0.0.125 2009.07.23 -
McAfee 5686 2009.07.23 -
McAfee+Artemis 5686 2009.07.23 Artemis!2E2715FD8FD2
McAfee-GW-Edition 6.8.5 2009.07.23 Heuristic.BehavesLike.Win32.Packed.A
Microsoft 1.4903 2009.07.23 -
NOD32 4270 2009.07.23 -
Norman 6.01.09 2009.07.22 Fujack.T
nProtect 2009.1.8.0 2009.07.23 Trojan/W32.Agent.55765
PCTools 4.4.2.0 2009.07.23 -
Prevx 3.0 2009.07.23 High Risk Worm
Rising 21.39.34.00 2009.07.23 -
Sophos 4.44.0 2009.07.23 Mal/Generic-A
Sunbelt 3.2.1858.2 2009.07.23 Trojan.Crypt.AntiSig.b (v)
Symantec 1.4.4.12 2009.07.23 Trojan Horse
TheHacker 6.3.4.3.372 2009.07.23 -
TrendMicro 8.950.0.1094 2009.07.23 -
ViRobot 2009.7.23.1849 2009.07.23 Backdoor.Win32.IRCBot.35288
VirusBuster 4.6.5.0 2009.07.23 Trojan.XPACK.BY

[nivek_hcerg]

upload it to threatexpert.com for an additional analysis and post the report or link to the report here

[rika]

from what i know about AV there is the diffrent companies that produce AV soft use diffrent names for a single threat like this

W32.WaledacRisk Level 2: LowPrinter Friendly Page
SUMMARY TECHNICAL DETAILS REMOVAL Discovered: December 23, 2008
Updated: December 23, 2008 1:34:08 PM
Also Known As: TROJ_GENETIK.TI [Trend], Email-Worm:W32/Waledac.A [F-Secure], Troj/Waled-C [Sophos], WORM_WALEDAC.C [Trend], WORM_WALEDAC.AB [Trend], WORM_WALEDAC.AS [Trend], Iksmas.A.worm [Panda Software], WORM_WALEDAC.AI [Trend], W32/Waled-Q [Sophos], W32/Waled-R [Sophos], Trojan:W32/Waledac.A [F-Secure], Troj/Waled-U [Sophos], W32/Waled-Z [Sophos], Troj/Waled-AB [Sophos], W32/Waled-AF [Sophos], Win32/Waledac.AJ [Computer Associates], Mal/WaledPak-B [Sophos], WORM_WALEDAC.BK [Trend], W32/Waled-AW [Sophos], Win32/Waledac.Z [Computer Associates], Mal/WaledPak-D [Sophos], WORM_WALEDAC.CRV [Trend], WORM_WALEDAC.ED [Trend], W32/Waledac.AX [Panda Software], WORM_WALEDAC.DU [Trend]
Type: Worm
Infection Length: 386,560 bytes
Systems Affected: Windows 98, Windows 95, Windows XP, Windows Me, Windows Vista, Windows NT, Windows Server 2003, Windows 2000

W32.Waledac is a worm that spreads by sending email containing links to copies of itself. It also opens a back door on the compromised computer.

this is from symatec def page

[fletch]

A lot of patches for cracked software are seen as dangerous because of the make-up of the crack/patch.

Some are bad some are clean but different AV scanners will show different results,

That's one of the penalties of using cracked software {a risk}

[nivek_hcerg]

Best way is to patch them yourself xD

[mackemking]

A lot of patches for cracked software are seen as dangerous because of the make-up of the crack/patch.

Some are bad some are clean but different AV scanners will show different results,

That's one of the penalties of using cracked software {a risk}

I agree... I dont usually use cracks, this was given to me by a mate hence why I ran it through virus total in the first place...

upload it to threatexpert.com for an additional analysis and post the report or link to the report here

Sorry I would do but I let A squared delete...
Thought 58.98% was a risk I didnt want to take

[nivek_hcerg]

Ok. Have fun buying the software then

[mackemking]

Sorry to be a pest, but also in these results, KAV didnt pick up the "infection" - should that be worrying when the likes of NOD and mcafee didnt detect it either?

[nivek_hcerg]

Upload it to kaspersky's labs for analysis on their side then. Also, are you running 2 AVs on the same PC?

[mackemking]

Upload it to kaspersky's labs for analysis on their side then. Also, are you running 2 AVs on the same PC?

KIS and since a couple of hours ago Ive been trying out a squared.. will these conflict?